There is also no question that The Times, though a national newspaper, shares the prevailing sensibilities of the city and region where it is published. It does not take creationism or intelligent design as serious alternatives to the theory of evolution.This is not sharing "prevailing sensibilities." This is simply reporting overwhelming scientific evidence. It is no more about sharing sensibilities than not taking flat-earthers seriously is about sharing sensibilities.
A line in Clark Hoyt's final column bothers me
He writes:
